Here's an interesting little piece in the NY Times about one of our favorite topics, Kindergarten readiness! My take on the five commentators' pieces is that no one really seems to disagree: current K curriculums are getting pressure to be more academic and contain more literacy and math than is appropriate for a genuine K program; that "kindergarten readiness" is by necessity relative to the curriculum of the potential class placement; and that while children of upper/middle class people may not need the early start in kindergarten because of literacy-rich environments at home, those of lower SES or disadvantaged or minority backgrounds do need the early kindergarten experience in order to avoid later equity traps.
Welcome!
Monday, June 13, 2011
Who's Ready for Kindergarten?
Here's an interesting little piece in the NY Times about one of our favorite topics, Kindergarten readiness! My take on the five commentators' pieces is that no one really seems to disagree: current K curriculums are getting pressure to be more academic and contain more literacy and math than is appropriate for a genuine K program; that "kindergarten readiness" is by necessity relative to the curriculum of the potential class placement; and that while children of upper/middle class people may not need the early start in kindergarten because of literacy-rich environments at home, those of lower SES or disadvantaged or minority backgrounds do need the early kindergarten experience in order to avoid later equity traps. Wednesday, June 8, 2011
The brain is a fascinating place...

Brain calistenics for abstract ideas, by Benedict Carey
For years school curriculums have emphasized top-down instruction, especially for topics like math and science. Learn the rules first — the theorems, the order of operations, Newton’s laws — then make a run at the problem list at the end of the chapter. Yet recent research has found that true experts have something at least as valuable as a mastery of the rules: gut instinct, an instantaneous grasp of the type of problem they’re up against. Like the ballplayer who can “read” pitches early, or the chess master who “sees” the best move, they’ve developed a great eye.
Now, a small group of cognitive scientists is arguing that schools and students could take far more advantage of this same bottom-up ability, called perceptual learning. The brain is a pattern-recognition machine, after all, and when focused properly, it can quickly deepen a person’s grasp of a principle, new studies suggest. Better yet, perceptual knowledge builds automatically: There’s no reason someone with a good eye for fashion or wordplay cannot develop an intuition for classifying rocks or mammals or algebraic equations, given a little interest or motivation.
Thanks to Sima for the tip to this article!