Welcome!

Welcome to the blog of Zaq Roberts, Associate Head of School at The Berkeley School in Berkeley, CA. I blog about a wide variety of topics, from classroom moments I witness, to administrative events and conversations, to the educational blogs, videos, and books I am reading and watching, and how they are influencing my thinking. I hope this eclectic approach will give you insight into the many ways that I am engaging in advancing the school and strengthening our program, and I welcome your thoughts and comments!

This blog takes its name from a quotation by Archimedes that reads "Give me a lever long enough, and I can move the world." The TBS mission speaks directly to the need to engage a changing world, while many of the experiences in our program focus on the development of students' agency and authority. TBS is the lever by which we all - administration, faculty, students, and parents - can together move the world to be more humane, compassionate, and responsive. To borrow an important Montessori phrase, it is our way to remake the world.

Monday, August 27, 2012

Q: How do you make CPR and First Aid training fun?

A: By doing it with an incredible group of people!


Kyla practices wrapping a bandage on Sima.

Norman and Randy get into the act when Randy looses a hand.

Do you see the knife sticking out of Craig's right shoulder?

Laura's arm gets put in a sling.

Make sure the scene is clear before delivering a shock from the AED!

Nancy and Craig practice the heimlich maneuver.

Benicia and Mitch perfect their CPR technique.

Thursday, August 23, 2012

Yesterday's Admin Retreat


Yesterday the TBS admin team held an off-site retreat at evolve! studio in Berkeley, a small space located above the Freshly Cut Florist on 1301 #d California St (across from Monterey Market) that is so hip and locally-driven that it doesn't have a website (it does, however, host regular Soul Collage meetings, a book I gave my wife on her 38 birthday).


The first activity of the day was a presentation and discussion led by Mitch about the differing values, traits, and gifts and challenges of different generations. While our student's grandparents are largely Traditionalists (1922-43), our parents are mostly Boomers (1943-60) or Gen Xers (1961-1980), with a scattering of Millenials (1981-2000) thrown in on the younger end. Each generation has been shaped by very different forces in very different contexts, and understanding how each generation sees, and is seen by, the other generations, is important as we think about both promoting community within our parent body, and clearly communicating about our educational program in our marketing efforts. And, because we are who we are, we also enjoyed applying critical race theory, post-feminist, and other forms of critiques to the concepts we discussed.


The second discussion was a review of the marketing and re-branding efforts undertaken by the advancement office over the last several months. In addition to our incredible new website rolling out next week, we're revising a number of aspects of our communication, from the timing and template of the weekly NewsNotes newsletter to the signature block in our emails. On September 6th we'll be hosting an evening event from 7-8:30 pm with a "brand reveal", a summary of information from last spring's parent survey, and a financial status update.

After lunch (at Lilly's Restaurant down on Hopkins St), we returned for a walk through the Leadership Compass, a tool for self-reflection and leadership development loosely based on the Native American concept of the "Four-Fold Way". We began by gathering into groups based on which working styles we "default" to, whether when stressed or simply as our usual starting point -- the in-charge activist, the visionary, the nurturer, or the analyst. After reviewing some descriptions and materials about these archetypes, we worked in groups to identify and share a) what others should know about us when working with us, b) the gifts and challenges of being in this archetype, and c) our theme song.


The day concluded with a preview of the schedule for Work Week, including finalizing details for the New Faculty Orientation, the schedule of all-faculty and division meetings and the topics that we wanted to discuss at them, and reviewing assignments and roles for next Friday's New Parent Orientation.

Wednesday, August 22, 2012

Presenting at NAIS 2013

Huzzah! Today I learned that my proposal to present at the 2013 NAIS Annual Conference in Philadelphia has been accepted. I'm thrilled to have the opportunity to engage in dialogue with other educators and administrators about this topic, and also to sharpen my own thinking as I continue this important work this year at TBS. Below is the abstract for the one-hour workshop that will appear in the virtual handbook NAIS puts out (I put up the full proposal in an earlier post).

Changing School Culture At the Division Level
School culture needs to be cultivated and developed through intention and effort to support and align with a school’s mission. Learn about the theories behind how cultures form and mature, delve into a case study of one school’s work in this area, and leave with pragmatic tools and ideas for nurturing the culture of your school at a division-wide level.

Monday, August 20, 2012

We're back at work...

Fun energy abounds at TBS as admin and faculty begin to prepare for the new school year, now that Steve+Kate's summer camp is over!

Yu-Ren assembled new storage in several admin offices, including Mohammad's office.

Steve+Kate's put the finishing touches on their campus clean-up.

The Sun Room (and many other rooms) have been repainted in a delicious, warm buttery yellow.

New (and former) Middle School Division Head Gretchen Griswold took a lunch break from setting up the new 6th grade classroom (which has switched places with what was formerly the "main room" in the middle school).

Every detail is attended too, down to sharpening and arranging the colored pencils.

Supplies wait to be sorted and set up in the Middle School Science Room.

New Laurel Creek teacher Cate Dayan familiarized herself with the class library.

Jeff Grether (4/5) and Shannon Collins (K/1) share a laugh.

All of the exterior wood surfaces have been refinished and re-stained.

Thursday, August 9, 2012

Do games make effective instructional tools?

I love playing games. Rhythm and drama games, games of chance and luck, team and individual sports,  board games and card games, strategy games and logic problems, even jigsaw puzzles: I haven't met a game I didn't enjoy. One of my earliest memories -- and a favorite family story about my childhood -- is beating my father and brother in two consecutive games of Uno at the tender age of three while on a houseboat in Florida (both times I ended with two wilds in my hand).

Games are one of several powerful forms of play (along with imaginative play, rough-and-tumble play, object play, etc), and as Dr. Stuart Brown taught us, play is an essential life skill that has a direct impact on brain development, physiological and emotional health, social skills, professional success, and learning and memory. Which is why I enjoyed reading a recent CNN article about the Quest to Learn school in New York, which uses games as the primary instructional technique in the classroom.

At TBS, we also believe in the effectiveness of play as a basis for educative experience, and though it isn't the central pedagogical tool used in our classroom, it is deeply integrated into our practices. I wrote about the use of games in a K/1 Reading Workshop class this spring in Mission Moments #5, while the Investigations in Numbers, Data and Space math curriculum contains an extraordinarily rich variety of games including student favorites Roll and Record, Close to 100, Factor Bingo, and many more. Games are also a part of the Montessori approach, including the Stamp Game, which is used for teaching addition, subtraction, multiplication and division, and the Imaginary Island Project, which teaches a variety of concepts about physical and cultural geography.

Going beyond playing games for the educative experience of knowledge construction and skill building that can result, I also see great value in teaching children to think critically about how games work, as it teaches them to identify context, frames, and principles.  As a middle school teacher, I offered a course in game theory and design, in which we analyze the construction, rules, and guiding principles of games beginning with Tic Tac Toe and Rock Paper Scissors, moving on to Connect Four, checkers, and chess, and finishing with board games such as Monopoly and Risk. For a final project, students designed and built prototypes of their own games (which we then played in order to assess the design and underlying principles).

Connecting game-playing to the TBS mission to engage a changing world, check out Jane McGonigal's TED talk about games, and the possibility that games can actually be agents of social and societal change. She points to a real-life example of gamers finding a solution for how to fold certain proteins in certain ways that scientists had been unable solve as the potential for games to lead to a better world.




Problem solving is a type of game, so here's a problem that I'm also forwarding to our 4th-8th grade math teachers. It's the classic "Monty Hall" problem, and it's great for teaching concepts in probability, and for the ability to replicate and simulate variations to test answers within the classroom:

Suppose you're on a game show, and you're given the choice of three doors: Behind one door is a car; behind the others, goats. You pick a door, say No. 1 [but the door is not opened], and the host, who knows what's behind the doors, opens another door, say No. 3, which has a goat. He then says to you, "Do you want to pick door No. 2?" Is it to your advantage to switch your choice?

You can check your solution here (warning, it's a link to Wikipedia).

9/7/12 Update: Here's another school using game-based pedagogy.

Thursday, August 2, 2012

Lessons from Accreditation Service

I was going through a stack of papers this morning when I discovered some notes I had taken during my work on a WASC Accreditation Visiting Committee this spring - thoughts for me to bring back to TBS's upcoming self-study and accreditation work this year. I shared what I learned when I served on a committee back in 2011, so here are the nuggets I gleaned this time around.

1. Evidence binders need Tables of Contents with page numbers for each document, and the documents should be paginated properly. This makes it far easier for a VC member to see if the document s/he wants is in fact in that binder, and to locate it.

2. Limit the number of evidence binders, and make sure they have the right information. It's important to have binders for each chapter, and each one should have the essential documents that support the conclusions of the self-study, but other binders and documentation should be clearly labeled as auxiliary.

3. It's nice to have a check-in meeting with the school's accreditation leadership team early in the morning. This gives the committee a chance to comment on their progress, review and make any needed changes to the schedule, and helps the leadership team feel informed.

4. The VC truly cares about broad stakeholder involvement. This needs to begin with the process of educating the community, extend to participation in the writing of the self-study, and be visible during the visit.

5. Incorporate at least one meeting with students into the schedule. Be intentional about how students are included, and don't try to "stack" the meeting (though it's also fine to identify strongly verbal students, or student leadership council, who you want to the VC to speak with as well).

6. Make sure the Board of Trustees turns out in force during the visit. Perhaps it's obvious, but poor visibility by Board members does not inspire confidence about the school's governance.

7. The VC's presentation to the community may operate only on a broad level, and save making any detailed recommendations for the private ears of the Head of School and accreditation leadership team.

8. Remember that the goal of accreditation is a process of reflection and self-improvement; it might be hard to hear the VC identify problems or make recommendations that are outside of what we articulate in the self-study, but if they do, it's for good reasons!

Wednesday, August 1, 2012

Thinking and Linking Pt. 4

This Edutopia post by Suzie Boss is a little scattershot in its coverage of some of the issues related to project-based learning, but it gets right at the heart of the matter by asking teachers to design projects focused on "what's worth learning" - in other words, to determine the learning outcomes in advance of the project.

USA Today published an opinion piece advocating for greater cultural competency and culturally-relevant teaching in addressing the differing needs of Latinos and African Americans. This is a much-needed step in beginning to close the achievement and equity gap between those groups on one hand, and Asian Americans and Caucasians on the other hand.

EdWeek had a report from AERA on meta-studies looking at teacher evaluation systems. Some interesting results came out: most systems "use too few classroom observations, indicators that are not effective at gauging student achievement, and lump teachers into too-simplistic categories". This has interesting synergy with the Huffington Post's five recommendations for a good evaluation process, from the perspective of teachers.

To riff again on the teachers-coaching-admin theme, here's a post on CNN about what one teacher wants in and from her administrators.

The South Florida Sun-Sentinel reports on a public school district trying to take a step in the right direction about grades.

Societal expectations and children's own development often lead parents to back away from direct interaction with their children's educational experience as a child reaches middle school and high school. U.S. News offers some good reasons why it's important to stay engaged during these critical years, starting with the quality of student learning.

The New York Times reported on the debate between Core Knowledge and Balanced Literacy. In addition to the important critiques of the study raised in the article, I want to know who gets to determine what content knowledge is important to test for in K-2 reading comprehension, and what testing mechanisms were used.

Here's a great one-two ending combo advocating for the social and emotional lives of children. First, The Washington Post gives ASCD a platform to advocate for whole-child education. Second, CNN tells us the love is the key to brain development in children. Hurrah!